Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ronda Ross's avatar

It is one of the greatest political ironies in US history that SCOTUS could not aid the Democratic Party more, then if it ruled a citizen only census, would decide apportionment going forward.

The number of Americans fleeing Blue states, in the last decade, has been so great, without millions of foreign new arrivals, there is a chance Dems would lose the House permanently.

Even with the replacement bodies, number of House seats lost from Blue to Red States in 2030 will be 10-12.

Perhaps even more importantly, importing new residents has allowed Blue States to retain unpopular policies, that have driven American residents away in droves, and will likely continue to do so.

Meanwhile, the drain on state resources is about to explode, as hundreds of billions of dollars in federal migrant aid disappears. Total state and federal migrant spending, in just 4 years under Biden, totaled roughly a 1/2 trillion dollars. As federal dollars disappear, Blues states with large dependent migrant populations will drown in debt attempting to maintain subsidies, without the aid of federal printing presses.

If SCOTUS were to rule only eligible voters would be counted for apportionment sake, Blue States would pass any Trump removal goals, at the speed of sound. The moment migrants did not aid their reapportionment counts, Dems would stop protesting ICE raids and start producing "Bon Voyage" signs. The change in policy would likely greatly improve future Dem electoral fortunes, especially if the next 3 years of fraud investigations, reveal much of it to be migrant based.

Expand full comment
ban nock's avatar

A while ago on these pages I read of polling showing Democrats with a brand problem. When offered the same set of policy options of a fictitious candidate, support dropped conclusively when the candidate was identified as a Democrat.

I've never seen a time with a greater opportunity for a change in immigration policy. The Democratic Party must change to survive as the examples in Ireland and England show. Words are not enough, nutty as he might be everyone can see that Trump did close the border and is deporting illegal immigrants.

A bill from congress should pass the simple test put forth by the by the civil rights icon Barbara Jordan who was chair of the congressionally mandated study known as the Jordan commission.........

“credibility of immigration policy can be measured by a simple yardstick: people who should get in, do get in; people who should not get in, are kept out; and people who are judged deportable are required to leave.”

Figure out a realistic way to do as Jordan suggested, and we can win elections again without hoping the other folks will simply be so inept we win by default. I don't like to see open confrontation between law enforcement and activists in our streets. We need a more orderly and effective process to do as Jordan said "people who are judged deportable are required to leave.”

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?