Conservative Populism may have been defeated , but so too was any chance of economic gains for the Canadian people . For the past decade, the economic outcomes of Liberal policies in Canada have been horrendous. In what should be, one of the wealthiest places on the globe.
Canada has the 2nd largest landmass on earth, and very few people. 40 million souls, dwelling in one of the least densely populated places on earth, covered in timber. Yet they have a horrendous housing shortage and affordability problem?
The tiny population, sits on a sea of oil, gas and other valuable natural resources, but Canadian currency is constantly weak, economic growth has been anemic for a decade and Canada's once sane immigration system, has been chucked, for open borders.
Canadians shouldn't be mad at Americans for electing Trump. They should own a good chuck of the US. With their natural resources and small population, Canada should have a sovereign wealth fund that rivals Norway or Dubai. Instead they vote for more of the same, because of a hyperbole prone American President?
Canadians not only won the natural resource lottery, they did OK in the neighbor department, as well . For the past 80 years, the US has provided free national defense to Canada. China protects smaller boarders than Canada's with a 2 million man military. The Canadians are protected by 70K people. The toy military works, because the large, expensive guard dog to the South, protects not just his backyard, but the neighbor's as well. To say nothing of the perk, of residing next to the largest group of wealthy consumers on earth.
Yet with all these advantages, Canadians can only produce some of the worst economic numbers in the First World? It would appear, just about everyone lost, on Canada's Election Day.
Imagine being so afraid of a foreign politician that you elect a central banker from two countries one of which isn't yours. If you look up globalist in the dictionary, there is a picture of Carney. Mexico has a lot of similar issues with the US but more dignity.
So Canadian liberals apparently have had longer to perfect their game of performative politics, a theatrics their American counterparts have to date proven childishly laughable at pulling off.
There are two overriding lessons in Canada's liberal comeback election. The first is for Canada's Carney: You bought time, but while you have shaken off the imagined conservative "threat" to Canada's future governance, Canada likely remains burdened by the statism of its now emboldened and likely more destructive Looney Left.
The second is for Donald Trump: You have been blessed and normalized in a fashion by the sheer idiocy of your political tormentors. Canada's liberals and Left do not need to modify when they have been blessed by Donald Trump's silly rants about annexing Canada as a 51st U.S. state.
As one of the majority of people who have a background in market economics and seriously regard the need to transition away from fossil fuels and limit national debt, I wonder how Mr. Carney proposes to replace the revenue lost by eliminating the carbon tax.
Also, as a strong advocate of national defense in concert with allies, I join Canadians in abhorring Trump’s unwarranted insults to them, and implying that they should become a U.S. state subject to control by the U.S. political establishment tops the list.
People often use “border security” and “immigration” interchangeably. Trump is in much worse shape when pollsters use the latter phrase. It is a combination of his flaunting the rule of law and his haphazard approach to decision making.
Conservative Populism may have been defeated , but so too was any chance of economic gains for the Canadian people . For the past decade, the economic outcomes of Liberal policies in Canada have been horrendous. In what should be, one of the wealthiest places on the globe.
Canada has the 2nd largest landmass on earth, and very few people. 40 million souls, dwelling in one of the least densely populated places on earth, covered in timber. Yet they have a horrendous housing shortage and affordability problem?
The tiny population, sits on a sea of oil, gas and other valuable natural resources, but Canadian currency is constantly weak, economic growth has been anemic for a decade and Canada's once sane immigration system, has been chucked, for open borders.
Canadians shouldn't be mad at Americans for electing Trump. They should own a good chuck of the US. With their natural resources and small population, Canada should have a sovereign wealth fund that rivals Norway or Dubai. Instead they vote for more of the same, because of a hyperbole prone American President?
Canadians not only won the natural resource lottery, they did OK in the neighbor department, as well . For the past 80 years, the US has provided free national defense to Canada. China protects smaller boarders than Canada's with a 2 million man military. The Canadians are protected by 70K people. The toy military works, because the large, expensive guard dog to the South, protects not just his backyard, but the neighbor's as well. To say nothing of the perk, of residing next to the largest group of wealthy consumers on earth.
Yet with all these advantages, Canadians can only produce some of the worst economic numbers in the First World? It would appear, just about everyone lost, on Canada's Election Day.
Imagine being so afraid of a foreign politician that you elect a central banker from two countries one of which isn't yours. If you look up globalist in the dictionary, there is a picture of Carney. Mexico has a lot of similar issues with the US but more dignity.
Elbows up was an effective rallying cry for Canadians of all stripes. The divisive anti-woke message fell flat. It lost its faux authenticity.
So Canadian liberals apparently have had longer to perfect their game of performative politics, a theatrics their American counterparts have to date proven childishly laughable at pulling off.
There are two overriding lessons in Canada's liberal comeback election. The first is for Canada's Carney: You bought time, but while you have shaken off the imagined conservative "threat" to Canada's future governance, Canada likely remains burdened by the statism of its now emboldened and likely more destructive Looney Left.
The second is for Donald Trump: You have been blessed and normalized in a fashion by the sheer idiocy of your political tormentors. Canada's liberals and Left do not need to modify when they have been blessed by Donald Trump's silly rants about annexing Canada as a 51st U.S. state.
As one of the majority of people who have a background in market economics and seriously regard the need to transition away from fossil fuels and limit national debt, I wonder how Mr. Carney proposes to replace the revenue lost by eliminating the carbon tax.
Also, as a strong advocate of national defense in concert with allies, I join Canadians in abhorring Trump’s unwarranted insults to them, and implying that they should become a U.S. state subject to control by the U.S. political establishment tops the list.
People often use “border security” and “immigration” interchangeably. Trump is in much worse shape when pollsters use the latter phrase. It is a combination of his flaunting the rule of law and his haphazard approach to decision making.