Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Larry Schweikart's avatar

As you guys know, I discount polls including the recent one showing Trump at 50%.

I thought Ds were starting to turn it around in PA when, for 2 straight reports, they made minimal gains there . . . but nope. Back to GOP gains yet again, suggesting internal pushes for registration. The idiotic "jungle primary" scheme to perpetually elect Ds in CA is backfiring now, with the top two in the governor's race according to "ahem" polls being Rs. After pruning MN of 13,000 illegals, Trump moved out, but the deportations continue at record pace. I know you don't like to hear it but yes, many of these people vote, and no, they won't be voting D any more. Let's say it's "only" 50% who vote, so with 3.5m gone in just 14 mo., the Ds have nationally lost another 1.7 million off their rolls, not even mentioning the continued D-R or D-I registration shifts in every state we can track. Loosely, this translates to another 2m net Rs (or 2m fewer Ds) than just 14 months ago.

Somehow, Rs have hung on since Nov. to win 4/7 special elections, though the one in TX got all the media.

And despite the Supes ruling, the economy is starting to really heat up again. I maintain my prediction that Rs hold the House by 2-5, add a NH seat in the Senate. And J.D. Vance is still on my scorecard at 320 EVs in 2028, but as I'm sure you've noticed there is a three-way battle for the D nomination among Newsome, Mamdani, and Harris. I don't know why Ds don't like Newsome, but apparently they don't, and 30% love the Amazing Zohran and wouldn't care what the constitution says about nominating him. I think this explains the recent Harris push---she is the only one capable of NOT being blown out (but would still lose).

Ronda Ross's avatar

Excellent points. While affordability is likely to hit most US families with similar paychecks in a similar manner, geographic location may end up being more important than Party affiliation, regarding Immigration.

If only a few migrants arrived your area, the effect on housing, healthcare, schools and jobs was likely limited. Watching ICE toss anyone to the ground, even those obviously physically resisting arrest, will likely look like overkill.

Especially for a Dem ruling class often dwelling behind gates, with privately educated children. 3 migrant children, speaking 3 different languages, are unlikely to interrupt their 3rd graders reading lessons, or lessen teacher time. The local ER may now have a slightly longer line, but their Concierge Doctor's office remains uncrowded.

Texas, on the other hand, was hit with the full force of the wave for years, and is still attempting to deal with the fallout. CA spends nearly $8.5 billion annually, just on migrant healthcare alone, before massive education and other costs. That is with 54% of all US immigrants, dwelling both legally and illegally, also enrolled in federal welfare programs. If federal welfare actually ends for them, some state budgets will have little hope, but prayer.

Perhaps much the rest of the country is over Immigration as an issue, except to despise ICE. The midterms are still the better part of a year away. We shall see how the economy shakes out, if unexpectedly large tax refunds appease many, if Iran is Mullah free, and if memories of Biden's border fiasco fade.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?